Finance and legal
Paying because you cannot show it
The scene
Thursday afternoon. On the desk there is a claim: goods that arrived damaged, with a photo of a broken pallet and an email that has already been forwarded three times. The operations manager was on the dock that morning and remembers it clearly: that pallet went out intact, she watched it being loaded. The other side says otherwise and attaches its own photo. She is right, and she has no way of showing it.
Where it breaks
The video from that day exists. It is somewhere among the dock cameras, the yard cameras and the one at the exit, in one of the hours of that morning. Nobody remembers the exact minute, and the team that would have to look for it is the same team loading lorries today. Meanwhile the recording erases itself: the retention window keeps running even though the argument does not move.
What happens
The argument drags on: an email, a call, a meeting, another email. When someone finally sits down to look for the video, that date has already dropped out of the retention window. And the manager signs off the payment. Not because the claim was true, but because finding the moment cost more than accepting it.
With IRIS
IRIS does not only keep the dock video: it keeps what it understood in it. Which lorry, which dock, what was loaded and at what time. When the claim arrives, the manager types the number plate and the day, and has the moment in front of her the same afternoon she opens the email. Once the moment is pinned down, setting that video aside before the retention window closes takes one click. She still decides what to answer and what to negotiate; the difference is that now she answers with what happened, not with what she remembers.
Being right and not being able to show it costs exactly the same as being wrong.