Solutions by typeMobility analysis
How long is it occupied without actually being used?
Occupied isn’t the same as in use
Two thirty-five in the hotel dining room. One table has sat for eight minutes with the previous service still on it: plates, glasses and napkin exactly as they were left. On the left three people are standing, waiting for a table, and at the back two tables are laid and free but invisible from the door. The dining room isn’t full. It looks full, and that’s the whole difference.
3 cameras across 2 sectors
This is how you ask for it
«Tell me how long each space stays occupied, and alert me when one goes past the limit while people are waiting.»
Eight minutes a table, several times a service, is several covers not served that day. In a parking lot it is the thirty-minute space occupied for three hours: the people who actually came to store drive around once and leave. And in a charging space it is worse, because the car finished charging forty minutes ago and is still there, so the point is occupied while serving nobody. None of it breaks anything, and all of it gets paid.
You decide once
You decide this once, and it’s decided by whoever runs the place. You say which spaces or tables are measured, what the limit is on each, what hours it applies and who’s told when it’s exceeded. IRIS checks them all, all day, every day, with nobody having to go and look. If in August the limit goes from half an hour to an hour, you change the number and it’s already in force.
There’s no offense here, and almost never any bad faith. There’s a space that is occupied and not being used, which is the quietest way of losing money that exists: nothing breaks, nobody complains and nothing appears in any log. The uncleared table. The short-stay space with three hours on it. The car that finished charging and is still plugged in. In all three the camera was watching from the start, and the figure reached nobody.
This is asked for in two ways, and they’re worth telling apart. One is measuring: how long each space stays occupied and how many different cars pass through it in a day. That isn’t asked in a sentence, it’s drawn: you mark the space on the image, and from then on the time is a repeatable number, comparable across months and defensible if anyone disputes it. The other is alerting, and that one is a sentence: tell me when a table has gone five minutes uncleared and people are waiting for a seat.
Together they change how decisions get made. The number answers the big question: whether the short-stay area is the right size, whether more charging points are needed, or whether the problem was never the number of spaces but the turnover. The alert solves this afternoon: it reaches the floor manager while three people are still waiting at the door and that table can still be cleared.
What changes
Before, you knew this by walking the floor, and whoever walked it did so when they could. Space turnover was an estimate, and the uncleared table was discovered once the customer had already gone elsewhere. Now the time on each space measures itself and the alert arrives while it can still be fixed. Whoever builds the schedule decides with the week’s curve, not with what they remember.
Where we have seen it
CAM-499Eight minutes uncleared, and guests are waiting for a table
«Tell me if a table has gone more than five minutes uncleared while people are waiting for a seat.»
CAM-468Finished charging and still in the space
«Tell me when a car has been in the charging space for over half an hour after the charger finished.»
CAM-466Three hours in a thirty-minute space
«I want to know how long each short-stay space is occupied and how many different cars pass through it in a day.»
What it doesn’t do
This fines nobody and elevators no barrier. It measures time and alerts; what happens next is a person’s decision. It also does not know whose car it is: it does not identify the driver and keeps no record of anyone. And if a similar vehicle parks in the same space, the counter sees a new occupancy, not the same one. What it gives is occupancy time per space, not a history of people.
Questions
- Do you need to read the plate to know if a car overstays?
- Not for this. What’s measured is the space, not the vehicle: the space is marked on the image and the time it stays occupied without emptying is counted. If the car leaves and another arrives, the counter resets by itself, because the space was empty. That already gives you turnover and overstays. Reading plates is a different thing, asked for separately, with its own personal-data rules, and it isn’t needed to know that a thirty-minute space has been occupied for three hours.
- What if the table is uncleared because nobody’s waiting?
- Then it shouldn’t alert, and that’s why the rule carries both conditions. An uncleared table in an empty dining room isn’t a problem: it’s a pending task. It becomes a problem when people are waiting for a seat and the table is still laid, and that’s the sentence you write. The rest of the time the figure is still measured and shows up in the dining room’s status, but it doesn’t sound. Not everything important is an alarm: sometimes it is a number you look up.
- Does it work for an electric charging point?
- Yes, and it’s one of the clearest cases, because there an overstay blocks a service someone else needs. The camera sees that the car is still in the space; the charging point knows the session has ended. Where the site allows those two to be joined, the alert is exact: half an hour occupied after charging finished. Where it can’t, only the space’s occupancy time is measured, which already says plenty. What we don’t do is promise an integration we haven’t verified.
- Is this for issuing fines?
- No, and it isn’t designed for that. IRIS measures occupancy times and alerts; it does not penalize, does not identify the driver and produces no citation. What comes out is operational data: how long each space is occupied, how many different vehicles pass through it and which ones exceed the limit. What’s done with that —an announcement, sending someone, rethinking the spaces or changing the hours— is the organization’s call, and that decision remains a person’s.
The real interface, step by step
A camera looks. IRIS understands what it sees.
An extract of the real screen, no voice-over and hands-free. Each round poses another situation. What sits behind it is a good deal bigger than what you see.
- It lands in the tray
- You open it
- You confirm or dismiss
Not seeing yours here?
These words are the ones we have built, not the ones IRIS understands. The list falls short on purpose: you ask for it in a sentence, and sentences don’t run out. Tell us what is in front of your cameras and we’ll tell you whether it understands it, or not yet.
And the best part
A recording gets watched when nothing can be done.An alert lands while there’s still time to act.
IRIS raises the alert while it’s happening and says where: the camera, the time and the images from that moment. With that, whoever is on duty is still in time to act.
Tell us your problem and we’ll say whether IRIS understands it, or not yet.
A person answers, the same working day.